Feedback on group logline and any alterations made as a result.



This was our first attempt at a logline. Our feedback has helped us to improve our logline.
We need to develop the logline slightly and remove the mistake of having the teacher as a physicist rather than a biologist as physics teachers do not dissect animals/body parts. However we felt as though adding points such as "What is at stake, the objective goal" etc... takes away enigma and enters into the plot too much.

"A crazed biology teacher, based at Oxford University, begins to dissect more than just the dead animals."

1 comment:

  1. It's the 'what is at stake' that creates the enigma otherwise you have no conflict or drive in the narrative - please state what on-line resource you used to get this feedback
    REPLY

    ReplyDelete